The "heel'*print is curved. This results into the rounded shape of the hind part of the footprint.

The pace angle ranges between ca. 130 and 150', the trackwRQ Is QBIYow-gauged.

The manus print is visible in the trackway D.

Although the claw prints are sometimes visible, the gcnclal shRpc ls a typical of an IgQQBodoB track. Thc moIphotypc ls XgQQPtok?Atptus ol GlrMchslQHI tllRt IndlcRtcs a11 IguaIlodontld trackIHRkcf (Sarjcant er rIL, 1998).

Type 2 (large theropod)

Trackways A, 8, G, H and O.

Elongate, medium and large size footprints with long„

Bldented 6Dgefs with claw marks.

Length &om 30 cm up to 38 cm and width between 24

8Qd 27 cHL

The aspect ratio is between 1.2 and 1.4.

The angle between the digits H and IH is smaller(ca. 20')

than between digits III and IV (ca. 30'=. The

morphology allows us to assign these footprints to

thelopods due to the angle between the digits, to the

well marked ungueal phalanges, the longer than wide

track, the well de6ned hind of the foot, the impression

Of each digit being separated &Om the others, Rod

the mcH-visible cIavrs and 6ngcr yards. The pace

angle ranges between 160 and 178'. A well-defined

track is 2 cm deep. There are no marks &om digit I.

Although larger in size, the shape of these tracks is

Grallator-like, The morphotype is Grallaror or

Eubronres. The different between these genera has

been motif of debate. According to%'eems (1 992)

Eubrontes differ Irom Grallarorby a footprmt longer

thBQ 25 cion. Thc txMkrNNIMj. Is 8 I8fgc thcropod.